My experience with Holly as a parental coordinator was nothing short of frustrating and a complete waste of time and money. She demonstrated blatant bias, regularly disregarded the court order, and overstepped her role by attempting to alter the terms of our legally binding parenting agreement. Instead of remaining neutral and facilitating co-parenting as required, she repeatedly undermined my legal counsel and made decisions based on her own personal experiences as a divorced parent—completely ignoring the black-and-white terms of the court’s directives.
On multiple occasions, Holly used examples from her own life as a disgruntled co-parent to justify not following the existing parenting agreement, inserting her personal opinions where they had no place. Rather than enforcing the legal agreement, she twisted the process to suit her own perspective, making an already difficult situation even worse. Her job was to ensure compliance with the court order—not rewrite it to align with her personal history or experience.
To make matters worse, she charges $40 just to read an email, racking up unnecessary fees while doing little to actually resolve co-parenting issues.
Worst of all, Holly did not act in the best interests of the children involved, a fact even my co-parent agreed on. Instead of making decisions that prioritized their well-being, she focused on pushing her own opinions and interpretations, ignoring what was truly best for them.
For personal reasons, I am not leaving my full name, but I stand by my experience. I fully expect her office to respond with the predictable "we have no record of this client" statement, but that does not erase what happened. If you’re considering Holly as a parental coordinator, save your money—she does not respect legal agreements and only adds unnecessary conflict and cost to an already stressful situation. The day her services expired was a huge relief—an absolute waste of money and resources.
Edit to the Firm's response: This response is a textbook example of deflection and a refusal to take accountability. Instead of addressing concerns, it resorts to stigmatizing parents as "difficult people" while implying that PCs are infallible. The lack of self-awareness here is staggering—suggesting that only parents are ever at fault while completely ignoring the potential for bias or mistakes on the part of PCs or attorneys. This kind of response reeks of narcissism, as it dismisses any possibility of professional shortcomings and instead frames parents as the sole problem. True professionalism involves self-reflection, not blanket blame-shifting.
read moreread less