UPDATE: There is something about the truth that triggers people. They can ignore everything else until you share the truth with PRECISION. After I shared mine, things got very busy on The Foster Firms Review page. First, the firm's response questioned whether I was even a client. After I provided proof that I was, that response disappeared and was replaced with the lengthy response you now see below. Unfortunately, the new response still does not address the substance of my review: poor communication, disorganization, lack of urgency, inadequate responsiveness, and what I experienced as a lack of meaningful legal strategy and advocacy. And mine is similar to other 1-star reviews. What is also remarkable is that their response begins by saying, “Out of respect for your claim we will not go into details of what happened with your case,” and then proceeds to do exactly that. They publicly discuss and characterize the mediation, what opposing counsel allegedly offered, what they believed my case was worth, their litigation strategy, their explanation for the delays, and their version of what occurred during the representation. I didn't put ALL of those details of my case in my review. They did. To be clear: Explaining why a case may be complicated doesn't diminish my complaints about the quality of service I received while they represented me. Complexity does not explain poor communication, disorganization, lack of responsiveness or why I repeatedly felt I had to manage and follow up on my own legal matters. Then came a sudden wave of new 5-star reviews. I recognize some of the names as people who I received emails and phone calls from at the firm (and someone with the same last name). Those relationships are not disclosed in the reviews. I'll let the reader make their own judgement about a busoness that would have time to manage truthful reveiws but not their cases. I would side-eye any business that receives a critical customer review and is suddenly followed by a wave of glowing reviews from people connected to the business. And even worse? Any buisness offering clients some type of incentive to leave one. If the service speaks for itself, let the customers speak for it. Most importantly, their response does not change the outcome for me. I gave this firm two separate opportunities. I trusted them with matters that had significant consequences for me. And after all of that, I was left without representation, with remediation and repairs unfinished, and with permanent injuries. That is not rhetoric. That is the outcome I am living with. Their response may have gotten longer. Their review page may have gotten busier. The facts of my experience did not change. My review stands. --Original Review (full review in photos)-- Ask yourself, if your situation ends up like the people (like me) who wrote a review, is it worth it when there are PLENTY of attorneys out here who are stellar? As I searched my files to provide "proof" that I am a client, I realized Ive been begging this firm to be more organized and have better follow through since 2023. Its 2026!! IT IS NOT WORTH IT. -------- I gave this firm two separate cases and two opportunities. My experience was essentially the same both times: poor communication, disorganization, lack of urgency, and very little meaningful legal strategy or advocacy. While both cases were strung along for more than a year one of my matters went to mediation. During mediation, opposing counsel came to the table with an initial offer of approximately $3,000. I expected my attorney to provide strategy, advise me on an appropriate counteroffer, negotiate, and advocate for me. Instead, I received virtually no leadership or direction. That case was ultimately dismissed, and after entrusting it to this firm for so long, I was left with little to no opportunity to seek other counsel. And the consequences are real. I am now left with permanent physical ailments and necessary repairs and remediation that remain unfinished and unpaid for, with no (CONTINUED -see photo)
read moreread less