The Worthington Law Centre

I am submitting this formal grievance/review regarding a severe breach of professional conduct, failure to perform basic due diligence, and predatory fee-inflation practices by the respondent, Ms. Worthington of the Worthington Law Firm. During an initial consultation for critical criminal defense representation, Ms. Worthington retrieved a purported criminal history report ("rap sheet") that she claimed was tied to my identity. She proceeded to read aloud a litany of serious charges and prior convictions. None of these records belonged to me; they were entirely unassociated with my true legal background. Upon hearing these false allegations, I immediately and explicitly notified Ms. Worthington that she was operating under a flawed, incorrect, or misattributed record. I proactively offered to email my certified, true background documentation to rectify the mistake. Ms. Worthington flatly refused to accept, review, or cross-reference my verifiable record, stating rigidly that her information "came straight from the court." Despite my clear repudiation of the erroneous record, Ms. Worthington immediately leveraged the false charges to declare that the firm's retainer fee would dramatically increase. She used unverified, incorrect third-party data as a bad-faith justification to inflate her financial demands, completely ignoring her baseline duty of competence and accurate fact-finding. Ms. Worthington concluded the interaction by stating she would calculate a finalized, elevated price and follow up with me. She never made contact again. This abrupt abandonment occurred during a critical window of legal vulnerability, directly impacting my ability to secure timely representation to protect my rights and provide for my dependent children. Based on the rules governing legal practitioners in the State of California, the respondents conduct appears to violate the following standards: Rule 1.1 (Competence) Failure to apply the baseline diligence and thoroughness necessary to properly analyze a prospective clients legal matter by relying entirely on misattributed, unverified records. Rule 1.3 (Diligence)Failure to act with commitment and dedication to the interests of a client/prospective client, followed by an abrupt cessation of contact without notice. Rule 1.5 (Fees for Legal Services)Attempting to extract an unconscionable, inflated fee structured upon entirely fictional criminal liabilities. Business and Professions Code 6106 (Moral Turpitude/Dishonesty) Utilizing known false or disputed data as a pressure tactic to demand higher financial compensation constitutes dishonest conduct unbecoming of an officer of the court.

The attorneys and staff at The Worthington Law Center did an exceptional job managing expectations while offering genuine comfort and prompt updates throughout our case. Their dedication and hard work truly showed in the results.

The attorneys and the staff at the Worthington Law are complete professionals and outstanding at what they do. While I will not say what legal issues I had, I can literally say that they saved my life through their expertise and knowledge of the law. I will be forever grateful for their help and I recommend them extremely highly if you ever need their services.

Mr. Worthington and the staff was extremely helpful to me during my court case I went through. I was charged with a felony at first then it got dropped to a misdemeanor. I have two misdemeanor charges and Mr. Worthington was able to help me get the whole case dismissed I was extremely blessed and I am so thankful for Mr. Worthington don’t look elsewhere hire him.. Yea

The Worthington Law Centre was professional (and successful!) in every way. I can't recommend them more highly.