The Law Office of Macci Morse

I like to see a fellow addict work the program and turn there life around. Anonymity is important, but is it more important then other people’s lives? People relapse, recovery’s a process. At least make amends to the clients you worked with in those relapses. Admitting what you done to the recovery community is a good step. I looked up to her, it gave me hope to turn my life around. To see someone go from meth addiction and getting kid there kid taken by CPS to a lawyer. But it’s not ok that people been hurt during the last couple years by her addiction and relapses and they don’t have to disclose what they did. There’s no review of the cases during her relapses. But all us in the recovery community have to hear her take inventory and keep her dirty secrets. It don’t mean much if theirs no amends to the people she hurt. I wish you luck, I want to see people in recovery get their life back. There should be rules for lawyers to disclose relapses or have at least some clean time under your belt, a month or 2. Just be careful.

As a professional who has worked closely with families for many years, it is deeply troubling to witness the long-term damage that can result when individuals in positions of trust and influence fail to uphold their ethical and professional responsibilities. I have heard from countless families who have experienced similar patterns-bias, neglect of duty, and decisions made without full and fair consideration. Many remain silent, often out of fear or a sense of powerlessness. When someone in this kind of role consistently fails to act with objectivity and integrity, the impact is not just procedural-it is deeply human. Families deserve better, and our community deserves a higher standard--one rooted in transparency and accountability. If I can do anything of value for this community, let it be to speak the truth--so others are aware, better prepared, and not caught off guard by the same patterns I've seen too many families face.

Not professional or honest. She was assigned to a child in a visitation case. The whole case was turned upside down. She misled the child as well as the court. She didn't even meet the mother's family members. She sided with the father prior to meeting with the mother. The court should never assign her to another case involving a child. She was very inappropriate to other professionals involved with the case. Bottom line, she lied and misled the court.