Roumel Law

I can’t recommend Nick Roumel highly enough. He helped my parents navigate a very stressful situation when the unemployment agency wrongly claimed they owed money for benefits received during the pandemic. From start to finish, Nick was kind, patient, and incredibly knowledgeable—exactly the kind of advocate you want in your corner.

He treated my parents with genuine respect and care, taking the time to explain everything clearly and ensuring they felt supported throughout the process. It’s rare to find someone who combines such professionalism with true compassion.

Nick is a gentleman in every sense of the word, and as an attorney, he is truly a cut above the rest. I would trust him without hesitation to handle any case. If you’re looking for someone who is not only highly skilled but also deeply trustworthy, look no further.

I highly recommend Roumel Law. Nick is extremely responsive and experienced and achieved an outcome for me that was better than I initially expected. I am incredibly grateful for the support and care during a stressful time.

After reviewing this law firm one star without commenting being professional this firm choosed to attack me in response, after going through other fraudlent firms that I also reviewed, this firm is special and infact is not immune to discrimination allgedly, One of their staff apologized to me over email after I reviewed them the actual rating here they deserved in my case, that's why my review was not written, but when they will put finger in my mouth why should I not tell their own doings now, these respected people first scheduled the meeting then frivlously cancelled the meeting, not only this respected firm denied the decided meeting but also discriminated against me, looking for contingency representation, and member of protected classes as alleged. Furhter arbitrary and capricious decision of denial of intake, review process, and etc shows a lot's about their conduct. THEIR SOLUTIONS DOES NOT WORK FOR INDIVIDUALS LIKE ME.
Now it appears my initial review here was great and also it would have been a BIG ZERO if there would have been any option. Further I don't have time to review 40 different (Not cross checked this number) firm and write stories about my experience like anyone else here may have, each have their own stories, no need to mention to defame, there solutions are also not working. Some firms didn't help me still they were good and ethical to talk to and were reviewed 5 star as they have above and beyond intake staff, even if they can't help me in my particular cases.
Now all other bad reviews that firms/counsels may get from my end and read these can understand if you were not good that's why only I have reviewed you not good, what enemity I may have had against you otherwise?
Some of the firm assert one need to be client to review them on google, I think those firms needs to do more introspection about that, as if you mess up during the intake then there's no point you may get 5 stars as you have not deserved it.
If your solutions may not work for me, your solutions that you provide are useless for me, and now as I have drafted this I will share this to other people who will also say things like you said.

One more thing after last thing before I forget, there rating was absolute 5 which rings the wrong bells to me, and after that this unprofessional reply by them, I further get more doubt on them about their own rating, but as I said I don't have enimity with them as such as of now.

Now they will start to do more research on me to help my unh*o*ly defendants, because why would they not, they have a lot's of time for these things but not to hear intake meeting, and not to solve issues of people and earn for what they have started these great firm. I don't think anyone over here on google reviews can only review when they have taken your services as representation in hon'ble courts of justices, but if something in professional, and ideal fashion is not done one can review without having you onboarded on their case (s). This is a misunderstanding many other firms also do. People are not just reviewing you bad if you would have dealt with clients with dignity and respect, even if you are not taking their cases people still come to give you a 5 star.
Profiling of me based on previous reviews, by your team tell a lot about you and your firm ethics, instead of spending your precious time on drafting apology email, and this reply just you should have heard the matter with respect and then letted it go, but you did not choose to do that, and disrespected your potential clients.

Further you also mentioned that you don't take cases as complex as mine, that also tells about low hanging fruit case taking nature of the firm. I did little research many claims get settled which is often good per everyone in judiciary plaintiff, defendant, and other entities this can also signal in SOME cases making it low hanging and forcing plaintiff to settle early.

Instead of writing replies targeting me, you can upon your personal and firms WILL start thinking about why would one give you 1 star
ending this from my side.