Robert A. Gleaner, P.C.

As a real estate agent, I recommend all of my real estate clients to Rob. He understands the industry and guides them with perfection through any complications.

Be aware of this horrible attorney. Because of his lousy and unprofessional work he lost me $100K He doesn't have the correct knowledge and comes unprepared in front of the township board. I hired him originally because he was confident he would be able to win my case but it was all a LIE. He only cares about how much money he can grab from your pocket, while he took all of mine and wasted 8 months of time. Do yourself a favor and stay away from him!!

*1/5 Stars - Disappointing Experience with Robert Gleaner

I hired Robert Gleaner to handle my subdivision case, but unfortunately, their representation fell short. Despite my clear instructions and expectations, they failed to deliver.

*Key Issues:*

- Lack of communication: I was often left in the dark about case developments.He did some research without my consent about similar cases which I paid for but the lawyer representing Bord rejected!!!!!
- Inadequate preparation: Robert Gleaner seemed unprepared for critical hearings. He was unable to answer basic questions: how many plots of land does the house stand on?
- Failure to address key issues: Crucial points were missed, leading to an unfavorable outcome.

*Result:* We lost the case, and I was left with significant financial losses and a delayed project.

*Disappointing Aspects:*

- Robert Gleaner didn't seem to understand the intricacies of subdivision law.
- Overpromised and underdelivered.

*Advice to Others:* Exercise caution when choosing Robert Gleaner for complex real estate cases. Research thoroughly and consider alternative options.

*Would Not Recommend.*!!!!!!!!

A huge regret of mine is hiring Rob. When I initially called him asking to subdivide my property he was confident and said he can handle the job with no problems. 8 excruciating months of working with him later he could not have been more wrong. When we were finally able to schedule a meeting with the township board the first time, Rob was sorely unprepared. He had zero definitive proof of the basis of his argument (for us to convince the board). A PRUDENT lawyer would back up his claims with facts and proofs but he had none. It was an embarrassment to watch first hand and then I knew I had made a mistake and was tricked by his initial false confidence.

The board asked some other trivial questions a prudent lawyer could answer but Rob had nothing. He used the excuse of not being able to "foresee" what the board would ask but they were asking basic questions. It was like it was his first time in front of the board. He had no problem charging us more and more for his mistakes when it could have been a yes from the board the first meeting. At the second meeting when Rob was finally prepared the board ended up saying no. We had one shot and the legal help we hired blew it.

Instead of taking blame, Rob blamed us for not doing initial research, not putting in the contract a contingency for a subdivision. No seller would have ever accepted that offer. We had a really good chance the first time but since Rob and our planner were not prepared for the questions it costed us 8 months and tens of thousands of dollars. What further confirmed my belief that Rob is terrible in this field is when I spoke to the townships zoning officer. She has had meetings with many, many lawyers and had many subdivision cases and she even said Rob was horrible. My biggest mistake was not going to her originally and getting a recommendation from her. Learn from my story and don't make the same mistake I have made.