AVOID GLOBAL LEGAL'S ANTHONY ARAGONA AT ALL COSTS. If I could give 0 STARS to Global Legal's newest partner, I would. My hiring of Anthony Aragona was the single worst legal experience of my life. I’ve worked with law firms before, but none had an attorney this careless or disappointing. Aragona even allowed my notarization to be pasted onto a document I never reviewed—riddled with errors—and served it on opposing counsel (OC), who lambasted it before the judge. That was just the tip of the iceberg. Over 14 MONTHS of being represented by Aragona at his previous firm, my case never had a single hearing. Not one. (Only after I went pro se did I finally get a hearing.) It’s not like we tried and lost—after 14 months and thousands of dollars, my case was in the same place, if not worse. Hiring him was like shoveling cash into a bonfire. Aragona’s SLOPPINESS showed constantly. He filed documents with other clients’ names still in them. At one hearing, OC told the judge Aragona filed a motion “purporting to represent Mitsubishi, not a party to this action.” He also grossly mishandled my interrogatories. First he sent OC a partial set with my answers under my own questions. When asked to resend, the answers were still under the wrong questions—so it looked like I was answering my own questions and not complying with discovery! Worse, MY NOTARIZATION HAD BEEN PASTED ONTO IT WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE. I learned this only when OC forwarded it to me. I rushed to file a corrective notice with the court. To me, that was a serious misrepresentation and felt like document mishandling of the worst kind. Despite this, the managing partner at his old firm wrote me that “Tony is an incredible attorney, so you are in very good hands.” My experience with him was anything but “incredible.” In my opinion, his sudden departure from that firm after just 18 months speaks for itself. Communication was poor—weeks went by with no updates, and I had to constantly chase him for basics. Then came the DISAPPEARING ACT: I was suddenly told Aragona had left the firm. Around the same time, I received a court notice my case faced dismissal for inactivity. In my view, it is no coincidence. His BILLING PRACTICES, IMO, were excessive and exploitative. 1.2 hours billed for a “discovery review” that took me ~15 min to read; 0.9h for a templated Proposal for Settlement that required maybe 5 min to swap names and numbers; 0.4h for a two-sentence email; 0.1h for a calendar entry; and 0.7h for two 30-second 65-word emails. These are but a few examples. When I first raised billing concerns via a detailed letter, his old firm gave me a $750 peanut “discount” without addressing a single example. Shortly after, Aragona was gone from that firm. IMHO, it’s hard not to suspect performance issues like the ones I lived through may have contributed to his sudden departure. After his departure from the firm, I again raised my concerns and notified Mr. Aragona of my intention to pursue a refund and file complaints if the matter was not resolved, he responded by accusing me of criminal extortion and even threatened to forward my communication to the State Attorney. This speaks to his character and, in my opinion, this was an intimidation attempt meant to silence a client raising legitimate grievances. I’ve documented everything and filed a Florida Bar complaint with a 42-page exhibit package. BOTTOM LINE: In my experience, Anthony Aragona mismanaged my case from start to finish, over-billed, humiliated me in court, then disappeared. His priority was never my outcome, but how much he could bill before ultimately walking away. If you value your time, your money, and quality legal work, STAY FAR AWAY from Anthony Aragona.
read moreread less