About the Attorney
Elise Buie Family Law is a premier law firm in Seattle, Washington, specializing in divorce, estate planning, and family law. With years of experience and a passion for helping families navigate difficult legal matters, Elise Buie and her team are dedicated to providing top-notch legal services tailored to each client’s unique needs. Whether you are going through a divorce, planning for the future of your estate, or need assistance with child custody issues, Elise Buie Family Law is here to guide you through the process with compassion and expertise. Trust your family’s future to the skilled attorneys at Elise Buie Family Law.
Practice Areas
Client Reviews
Share Your Experience
Your feedback helps others choose the right attorney.
Elise destroyed my family and my children’s and my life. Don’t walk away, run! As fast as you possibly can!! She manipulated, ignored and omitted information to fit her preferred narrative and in the end she realized her mistakes but refused to own them in court in order to save her own face. Please, I’m begging you to stay away from anything even remotely associated to her. The people who have been severely and negatively impacted by her (I’ve spoken to several) are too afraid to write reviews.
I was charged heavily for the firm to reorganize documents I had already organized, yet they refused to explain their formatting requirements. Communication was incredibly poor; I was denied periodic updates under the claim that my billing structure didn't cover them. Worse, just three months before my January 2026 trial date, the firm moved the trial out an additional six months without consulting me. When I questioned this, I was told that because I hadn't yet paid a $30k trial retainer, I had "no say" in keeping the date. On top of this, I was billed for "review time" before every single meeting for material they should have already been familiar with.
My case was straightforward—I simply wanted to get to arbitration—but the firm dragged it out until I was forced to switch counsel. Despite their marketing, I never received the "boutique" experience I signed up for. I felt entirely uncared for, seemingly because my net worth didn't match their typical clientele. I highly recommend looking elsewhere.
Colleen Clay — Primary Attorney
Sent a resignation letter because I sought a second opinion. During mediation I was uncomfortable with a proposed settlement and consulted other attorneys. She found this so offensive she sent a formal resignation letter. A client exercising basic due diligence should never trigger a resignation threat.
Unprepared at mediation. Our private mediator asked her directly: "Did you calculate the income? Did you consider the passive income? Why not?" She had no answer. Additionally, assets that should have been excluded from community property were listed at incorrect values — a significant miss that reflected no diligent review of documents before the session.
Argued with her own client, not opposing counsel. She pushed back on my well-reasoned positions while forwarding opposing counsel's demands without scrutiny. A mathematical discrepancy in the asset split went unresolved because she refused to call opposing counsel. I resolved it myself by calling the other party directly. He agreed immediately.
No strategy. Despite repeated requests, no case strategy or trial preparation plan was ever produced. We were wholly unprepared for trial, leaving settlement as the only option regardless of terms.
Elise — Firm Owner
Unavailable. Scheduling any appointment required over a week. On one occasion she called me, I missed it by seconds, called back immediately, and received a voicemail saying she had other matters and was moving on.
Two hours of advice that amounted to a book recommendation. I requested substantive guidance on the GAL process underway in my case. The entire call focused on co-parenting philosophy and concluded with a recommendation to read The Co-Parenting Handbook. I was sent into a high-stakes GAL evaluation completely unprepared.
Wrong on the law — and I proved it. She refused to pursue a child support deviation despite three case-law-supported arguments, claiming a judge might make me pay more. I terminated the firm, hired new counsel, pursued the deviation in arbitration, and won.
Risk aversion dressed up as legal advice. Neither attorney could articulate the specific weaknesses in my legal arguments. Their consistent position was to settle. Elise justified this partly by observing that my salary and assets exceeded those of most King County judges and I should expect little sympathy. That is not legal strategy.
Firm-wide pattern. Both attorneys told me I should feel proud to be taking care of my children — while I had transferred more than half my assets to the other party and was paying $130,000 in fees. When I told them to practice law and not act as family therapists, they took offense. This firm prioritizes settlements it finds philosophically appropriate over zealous representation of client interests.
If your case involves financial complexity or requires genuine advocacy, look elsewhere. And to the firm - please don't post your comment about wanting to chat - you failed and also know how to contact me.
- 1
- 2
- …
- 5
- >
Related Attorneys
Is this your profile?
Claim your listing to manage your information, respond to reviews, and connect with potential clients.
Own or work here?
Claim Now!
Claim Now!
Want to report this? Report Now!




